Friday, February 24, 2012
REVIEW: Number the Stars
Stage One Family
Theatre presents
NUMBER THE STARS
Adapted by DR.
DOUGLAS W. LARCHE
From the Book by LOIS
LOWRY
Directed by ANDREW D.
HARRIS
Reviewed by Cory
Vaughn
Entire contents are
copyright © 2012 Cory Vaughn. All rights reserved.
The Holocaust seems a difficult subject for anyone,
especially elementary-age children. Fortunately for the young patrons of Stage
One Family Theater, Number the Stars
is not so much about the Holocaust, but about friendship, innocence, and
courage among young girls, with the Holocaust as a historical backdrop for
these virtues to be tested. That was the right approach to take. The Holocaust
is best understood by first understanding the lives of those affected by it,
and even the students who cannot yet comprehend the Final Solution can easily
identify with these young heroines. I hope that all the students, of whatever
age, go home with questions about what they just saw those characters going
through, and that their teachers and parents can take it from there.
Based on Lois Lowry’s award-winning book, Number the Stars is set in Nazi-occupied
Copenhagen, where everything is rationed and SS officers lurk on every street
corner, but so far the occupation has been deceptively peaceful. The Johansen
family, around whom our story revolves, has spent the last year grieving the apparently
accidental death of eldest daughter Lise. The middle daughter, timid
ten-year-old Annemarie, is uneasy with her new role as the eldest, especially
in these difficult times, and she keeps a box under her bed filled with Lise’s
personal items and mementos to take refuge in when the going gets tough. Meanwhile,
irrepressible Kirsti, the baby of the family, skips joyfully through childhood,
little understanding the potential danger surrounding her.
Their loving parents are skilled at protecting their
daughters’ innocence while preparing them for the stark responsibilities of wartime.
Every night before bedtime, they tell their daughters stories about good King
Christian and how “all of Denmark is a soldier for him.” Both the innocence and
the courage mama and papa instill in their children serve them well when the
new regime begins targeting Danish Jews, including Annemarie’s best friend
Ellen Rosen. When Ellen’s family is marked for transport to a concentration
camp, the Johansens are put to the test, conceiving a plan to transport Ellen
and other Jewish neighbors to safety in unoccupied Sweden, aided by Lise’s
fearless fiancé Peter and a secretive uncle Henrik. Inevitably, of course, it
is Annemarie who must complete a dangerous mission to ensure everybody’s
safety, proving herself a soldier for Denmark in the process.
Director Andrew Harris, working from a theatrical adaptation
by Douglas W. Larche, creates genuine suspense as the Johansens and their
helpers use their wits to face one close shave after another. The suspense is
even more palpable because we see all these ingenious escapes through
Annemarie’s eyes, and like her, we don’t know what is really happening until
the end; what, for example, is that all-important package that inevitably falls
to Annemarie to deliver safely into Uncle Henrik’s hands before it is too late?
Because no programs were distributed at the student matinee
I attended, I had nothing to pull my attention from the story being told. I
recognized some of the cast members, but for the most part I was allowed to
forget about the actors and spend an hour getting to know these simply-drawn
but believable characters (I later found out from stage manager Kevin Casey who
the actors were). I found it rather refreshing to experience the story
unfolding in the same way as the students, although with one notable exception:
most of them have read the book, and I never have.
The students with whom I shared the morning were a bit
restless for 70 minutes. Number the Stars
is intended for grades 4 and up, as noted on promotional materials for the
play, yet on the day I saw the show, some third-graders
were admitted as well. I am informed by sources close to the production
(apparently as annoyed as I was) that the third-graders may have been the ones
who grew so fidgety during scene changes that they saw fit to clap in rhythm to
the transition music. Granted, their teachers failed to do their job by
allowing such behavior; I might suggest, however, that these scene changes
speed up and employ less percussive music in the future, thus discouraging
future young audiences from clapping along and taking the rest of us out of the
suspenseful mood that the entire production team worked so hard to create.
Despite that infuriating display of bad theatre etiquette, I
enjoyed myself much more than I anticipated, not knowing quite what to expect
from children’s theatre. Fear not, adults: there is plenty to interest those of
us who have aged beyond the target audience. Frequent patrons of Louisville
theatre may recognize a few of the nine impeccable veteran actors – Equity and
non – backing up the charismatic juvenile leads. There are locals like Jon
Huffman as Papa Johansen, Paul Kerr and Brian Hinds as menacing Nazi officers,
and Greg and Abigail Maupin of Le Petomane as two of the Jewish neighbors. Some
favorite visiting artists from recent seasons are back as well, like Matthew
Brennan of Derby Dinner Playhouse (as Peter) and Peter Riopelle of MTL (as
Henrik). Less familiar to me but certainly an effective contributor is McKinley
Carter, with her subtler but believable arc as quiet, resolute Mama Johansen
mirroring that of Annemarie; watching these two unadventurous women rise to the
challenge is sure to inspire mothers and daughters alike in the audience.
Overall, the play belongs to the kids. Twelve local students
share four roles (including the three boys rotating in the small role of Ellen’s
classmate/crush, Samuel), and the ones I saw were excellent, especially the
girls. Ashley Gurwell puts a lot of spunk into bratty Kirsti and endears
herself to the audience as comic relief, despite her character’s often vapid
abrasiveness. Shelbi Schooler and Sarah Westhoff, meanwhile, are adorable as
the more vulnerable older girls; the friendship between Ellen and Annemarie is
the heart of Number the Stars, and
evolves into a finale that is truly touching, if a bit too pat and tidy to be
entirely satisfying (true, not every major character lives to see it). But
although the skeptic in me digresses, I must admit that I wanted a happy ending
for these characters as much as anyone. If only the real Holocaust could have
ended as well . . .
NOTE: This play is recommended for grades 4 and above, due
to the constant threatening presence of German SS officers, implied violence
(including one character taking a loud slap in the face), and one very
tastefully handled scene in which Annemarie and Ellen engage in the kind of
harmless and silly role-play common to girls of that age; judging by the
reactions of some in the audience, very young children may not be mature enough
to handle the scene, in spite of its comic intent. Otherwise, I neither saw nor
heard anything offensive.
Number the Stars
Stage One Family Theatre
323 West Broadway, Suite 600
Louisville KY 40202
502-589-4060
Student matinees continue thru March 9 at 10am and 12pm
At The Kentucky Center’s Bomhard Theater
501 W. Main Street
Louisville KY 40202
Public Performances March 14-16
At The Paul W. Cultural and Community Ogle Center
Indiana University Southeast
4201 Grant Line Road
New Albany IN 47150
Tickets:
General Admission: $12.00
Students (with ID): $9.00
Featuring: Matthew Brennan (Peter), Brian Hinds (Soldier),
McKinley Carter (Mama Johansen), Jon Huffman (Papa Johansen), Paul Kerr (German
Officer), Abigail Bailey Maupin (Mrs. Hirsch), Gregory Maupin (Mr.
Rosen/Soldier), Linda Otto (Mrs. Rosen), and Peter Riopelle (Uncle
Henrik/Soldier)
Student Cast:
Annemarie Johansen: Sarah Bourlakas, Graham Pilotte, or
Sarah Westhoff
Ellen Rosen: Madison Cunningham, Katie Heit, or Shelbi
Schooler
Kirstie Johansen: Ashley Gurwell, Chloe Hill, or Sydney
Meyer
Samuel Hirsch: Jack Amend, Trey Paris, or Forrest White
Monday, February 20, 2012
REVIEW: Reflections: Murder in a Hall of Mirrors
Louisville’s own murder mystery theatre Whodunnit? opens another world premiere and introduces their audiences to a brand new villain in Reflections: Murder in a Hall of Mirrors.
Reviewed by Brian Walker
Whodunnit? switches gears from Haitian zombies and Sherlock Holmes with their latest offering and explores the world of Rhode Island court rooms, family grudges and demented millionaires. Otto Bales is “the epitome of evil” and rich as hell. He owns a home that’s notorious for a room called the Hall of Mirrors which is a long hall lined with carnival mirrors. He likes to spend time there to think and relax and he takes his business meetings there and now a dead mutilated body was been discovered there. All signs point to Otto’s guilt with his eccentric behavior and questionable past, or do they?
A. S. Waterman wrote, produced and directed this tight little tale of murder and deception and succeeds in creating a distinct world, a reasonable doubt and a cast of interesting characters and alternatives that draw the viewer in. I don't want to spoil anything by going into any of the sub-plots or relationships but I will say that once again; I was completely off base as to who the killer was and their motives, etc. These murder mysteries require full and complete attention to everything that comes out of the actor’s mouths and I think I’m spending my brain power on reviewing and not solving. At least that’s my excuse. As the conclusion was made apparent there were a few head scratches through the audience, but for the most part Ms.Waterman was able to cleverly and believably connect A to B to C without too many leaps of theatrical suspensions of disbelief. And twenty folks the night I reviewed got it right!
As with my experience with other Whodunnit? productions the acting was solid with varying degrees of experience and mastery of dialect.
Standouts included Craig Nolan Highley as Joel Winston and Graham Bell as Cal Carlson, both playing possible alternate murderers and inhabited their roles wonderfully both onstage and off while schmoozing with the audience tables.
The improvisation/audience interactions of the show are no easy feats for the actors and the entire cast really excelled. My mom and I were more concerned with seeing the little pug pictured in the program than solving the crime and no one allowed our silliness to throw them off their game. We should ask better questions; maybe then I could actually pick the real killer!
Brian Kennedy and Jane Mattingly were both also very good in their roles of dueling lawyers with a little sexual tension under the surface. They both succeeded in being incredibly endearing making it impossible to root for one more than the other. Plus good casting; they'd totally make a cute couple!
Erica Goldsmith remains my favorite performer of this troupe; her characters are always saucy and fiery and she is completely committed. She has a great time with the audience (she succeeded in making me blush for the SECOND time!). I’d like to see her in a larger role she could really sink her teeth into but am fully satisfied watching her steal most of her scenes in the smaller roles I’ve seen her play thus far.
Niles Welch was a little silly for me for someone who was playing the “epitome of evil.” I always enjoy watching him and his performance was very funny and got some laughs from the audience, but I think a more menacing portrayal would have been closer to who the character seemed to be in the script.
And to be nit-picky: a few of the actors needed a bit more fine tuning with the dialect work; there were times it felt more like the court room was in Brooklyn and not Rhode Island.
All aces for the service and food (as always). I had the mushroom ravioli and mom had the scrod and both were elegant and delicious! And for desert…Louisville’s (and my) favorite pie! Yum-o!
Whodunnit? offers another delightful production this season in Reflections: Murder in a Hall of Mirrors. It’s a fun night out and a theatrical escape from the real world that’s like nothing else in Louisville and if you like a good mystery you need to get yourself to the Hyatt (if you can get a ticket; full house the night I reviewed!) to see these folks do their thing.
Reflections: Murder in a Hall of Mirrors
by A.S. Waterman
Sat. Evenings, Feb. 11 – March 31, PLUS Special Valentine’s Day Show on Tues., Feb. 14:
WhoDunnit Murder Mystery Theater
Performing at The Hyatt Regency, 320 West Jefferson Street
Louisville, Kentucky
(502) 426-7100
http://www.whodunnitky.com
![]() |
Reviewed by Brian Walker
Whodunnit? switches gears from Haitian zombies and Sherlock Holmes with their latest offering and explores the world of Rhode Island court rooms, family grudges and demented millionaires. Otto Bales is “the epitome of evil” and rich as hell. He owns a home that’s notorious for a room called the Hall of Mirrors which is a long hall lined with carnival mirrors. He likes to spend time there to think and relax and he takes his business meetings there and now a dead mutilated body was been discovered there. All signs point to Otto’s guilt with his eccentric behavior and questionable past, or do they?
A. S. Waterman wrote, produced and directed this tight little tale of murder and deception and succeeds in creating a distinct world, a reasonable doubt and a cast of interesting characters and alternatives that draw the viewer in. I don't want to spoil anything by going into any of the sub-plots or relationships but I will say that once again; I was completely off base as to who the killer was and their motives, etc. These murder mysteries require full and complete attention to everything that comes out of the actor’s mouths and I think I’m spending my brain power on reviewing and not solving. At least that’s my excuse. As the conclusion was made apparent there were a few head scratches through the audience, but for the most part Ms.Waterman was able to cleverly and believably connect A to B to C without too many leaps of theatrical suspensions of disbelief. And twenty folks the night I reviewed got it right!
As with my experience with other Whodunnit? productions the acting was solid with varying degrees of experience and mastery of dialect.
Standouts included Craig Nolan Highley as Joel Winston and Graham Bell as Cal Carlson, both playing possible alternate murderers and inhabited their roles wonderfully both onstage and off while schmoozing with the audience tables.
The improvisation/audience interactions of the show are no easy feats for the actors and the entire cast really excelled. My mom and I were more concerned with seeing the little pug pictured in the program than solving the crime and no one allowed our silliness to throw them off their game. We should ask better questions; maybe then I could actually pick the real killer!
Brian Kennedy and Jane Mattingly were both also very good in their roles of dueling lawyers with a little sexual tension under the surface. They both succeeded in being incredibly endearing making it impossible to root for one more than the other. Plus good casting; they'd totally make a cute couple!
Erica Goldsmith remains my favorite performer of this troupe; her characters are always saucy and fiery and she is completely committed. She has a great time with the audience (she succeeded in making me blush for the SECOND time!). I’d like to see her in a larger role she could really sink her teeth into but am fully satisfied watching her steal most of her scenes in the smaller roles I’ve seen her play thus far.
Niles Welch was a little silly for me for someone who was playing the “epitome of evil.” I always enjoy watching him and his performance was very funny and got some laughs from the audience, but I think a more menacing portrayal would have been closer to who the character seemed to be in the script.
And to be nit-picky: a few of the actors needed a bit more fine tuning with the dialect work; there were times it felt more like the court room was in Brooklyn and not Rhode Island.
All aces for the service and food (as always). I had the mushroom ravioli and mom had the scrod and both were elegant and delicious! And for desert…Louisville’s (and my) favorite pie! Yum-o!
Whodunnit? offers another delightful production this season in Reflections: Murder in a Hall of Mirrors. It’s a fun night out and a theatrical escape from the real world that’s like nothing else in Louisville and if you like a good mystery you need to get yourself to the Hyatt (if you can get a ticket; full house the night I reviewed!) to see these folks do their thing.
Reflections: Murder in a Hall of Mirrors
by A.S. Waterman
Sat. Evenings, Feb. 11 – March 31, PLUS Special Valentine’s Day Show on Tues., Feb. 14:
WhoDunnit Murder Mystery Theater
Performing at The Hyatt Regency, 320 West Jefferson Street
Louisville, Kentucky
(502) 426-7100
http://www.whodunnitky.com
REVIEW: Patsy Cline: A Life in Concert
Reviewed by Mark Sawyer-Dailey
Even after 35 years of marriage, it’s important to find a new and different way to celebrate Valentine’s Day. We did just that last night when we attended Center Stage’s presentation of Melissa Kenney Shepherd’s PATSY CLINE: A LIFE IN CONCERT, Her Music, Her Influence, Her Legacy. Ms. Shepherd herself calls it a ‘celebration’ of Miss Cline’s life and music, and along with the rather long title, this says it all. This nightclub show has been performed all over the country by Ms. Shepherd and although I am a theatre critic, not a Cabaret critic, I think I can do her and her delightful performance justice. Not only was this a Valentine to all of the audience members (almost sold out, sitting at candle lit tables with drinks), it was also a Valentine from Ms. Shepherd to Miss Cline.
Even after 35 years of marriage, it’s important to find a new and different way to celebrate Valentine’s Day. We did just that last night when we attended Center Stage’s presentation of Melissa Kenney Shepherd’s PATSY CLINE: A LIFE IN CONCERT, Her Music, Her Influence, Her Legacy. Ms. Shepherd herself calls it a ‘celebration’ of Miss Cline’s life and music, and along with the rather long title, this says it all. This nightclub show has been performed all over the country by Ms. Shepherd and although I am a theatre critic, not a Cabaret critic, I think I can do her and her delightful performance justice. Not only was this a Valentine to all of the audience members (almost sold out, sitting at candle lit tables with drinks), it was also a Valentine from Ms. Shepherd to Miss Cline.
Something I learned from doing several one-person plays, the
performer inevitably learns a great deal about the person they are portraying,
or in Ms. Shepherd’s case, “celebrating”.
Shepherd does not take on the persona of Miss Cline, but as Melissa
Kenney Shepherd, talks directly to us about Ms. Cline, accenting her superb,
well chosen stories with songs. The
stories are short, educational, entertaining and they do not overpower the
songs, exactly perfect. Some of the
stories came from Mr. Patsy Cline, Charlie Dick, in a two-hour phone call Ms.
Shepherd had with him.
Shepherd performs against the simplest of sets: a cyclorama
and four excellent musicians: Mike Horvath on drums; Ben Moser on bass; Doug
Payne on guitar; and the multi-talented, always delightful Mr. Chris Bryant on
piano and who also doubles as Musical Director.
Less is more, and this atmosphere was just perfect for the evening. The cocktail
tables, wine glasses, candles, and people sitting at the tables were the most
important element of the set. She used
these people well, and we loved her.
She is a vibrant, enticing, attractive performer who is in
complete control of her material and her audience. I only wish the audience had been more
receptive to her welcome to ‘sing-a-long, dance with, and ‘yee-haw’ whenever
the spirit moves you’. It’s about the
time in my writing that I name the high point of her act, but that is difficult
to do, as there were so many. My
personal favorites were Willie Nelson’s CRAZY (yes, Willie penned this one!),
SWEET DREAMS, and in honor of the Gospels that Miss Cline so loved, JUST A
CLOSER WALK WITH THEE. She provides such
variety in her musical choices, and others in the audience loved SHE’S GOT YOU,
YOUR CHEATIN’ HEART and SIDE BY SIDE, in which she sung a duo with Mr.
Bryant…nice to hear and see them work together.
The performance was a true Valentine to others as well: Ms. Shepherd’s
father, John, her husband, Jason, and her most creative costume designer, Zhanna
Goldentul, were all in attendance - making it a very cozy, family affair. Ms. Goldentul designed four beautiful
costumes, created from pictures of Ms. Cline’s costumes. And Ms. Shepherd looked terrific in them!
PATSY CLINE A LIFE IN CONCERT runs through February 19 at
Center Stage. You will be entertained
and you will help support this exciting theatre.
Saturday, February 18, 2012
REVIEW: The Merry Widow
Kentucky Opera stages Franz Lehar’s The Merry Widow,directed by Michael Cavanagh (who also added some English dialogue).
Reviewed by Brian Walker
So, I’m thinking that there are opera people and then there are not-opera people and I’m also thinking that I have officially decided I fall into the camp of folks who just don’t get, don’t like it, and would rather listen to Nicki Minaj on the way home than sit through three hours of folks singing when they should be talking.
I hadn’t seen an opera since high school and maybe I’ll try again in another twenty years or so but until then (after this evening) I’m officially out.
The Merry Widow finds Hanna Glawari, a rich widow, looking for a husband at the Pontevedrian Embassy in Paris. Baron Mirko Zeta is the Pontevedrian Ambassador in Paris who is trying to find Ms. Glawari a mate in an effort to keep her money in the principality. He’s married to Valencienne who is having an affair with Camille de Rosillon, who is courting Hanna Glawari for her money. Enter Count Danilo Danilovitch who is the first secretary to the Baron and has a history with Hanna Glawari and maybe even some unrequited sensations. It’s all very cute and predictable and trite.
Are you bored yet? Yeah; I was too.
There‘s some modern language/current event references added in (I assume) to be relatable to a modern audience but I didn’t get it; they all served to de-rail the illusion of the time period and the suspension of disbelief that the story is supposed to be happening in 1913 and not 2012.
The curtain rose to much excitement with a stage full of performers bustling and moving and I was immediately drawn in. The set was very impressive with French period furniture and a huge staircase that seemed to go on forever and a chorus of enthusiastic and talented performers decked out in gorgeous black and white costumes that frilled and flowed and followed.
And then they all started singing and I struggled to stay engaged.
The chorus was really delightful; I found myself looking forward to them to return to the stage whenever they weren’t around. They all made really nice choices and did what a great chorus does: made up a single entity which created a world that happened around the principals and setting the stage to make the principals believable and interesting.
The principals were all fine opera singers but not a one really stuck out and made me sit up the way the chorus did. When they weren't singing most of the acting was incredibly stylized and very “I just said something funny now I’m going to look at you, the beautiful audience, and you can laugh.” There were also SEVERAL moments when the females who were supposed to be the focal point of the entire stage weren’t in their light. Maybe it was creative shadowing or something artsy like that, but many points in the evening it seemed the Opera ordered a few too few lights. Or maybe they just weren't strong enough. Or maybe there were plentyof lights, the darlings just couldn’t find them; I don’t know. I’m used to working in spaces with maybe seven lights total for the entire stage so what do I know anyway?
Alright. I promised myself I wasn’t going to get political with this review because it’s supposed to be about the art…BUT...I have to admit it was difficult and unsettling walking through the crowd of musicians protesting outside the Brown Friday night because they feel they’re being treated unfairly by the Orchestra (and by extension and even in many ways from the outside observer; by the Opera too) and then sitting down with my very glossy, very expensive looking program full of luxury car ads and pages upon pages of sponsors and advertisers. I’m just saying and that’s all I’m saying.
I don’t want to take away from the passion and hard work that went into making this production happen because the sheer spectacle of it was quite incredible and the audience really seemed to be engaged and enjoyed their evening at the opera; but overall and specifically this production just wasn’t for me.
The Merry Widow
2/17 and 2/19, 2012
at the Brown Theatre
Kentucky Opera
315 West Broadway
Louisville, Kentucky 40202
584-4500
http://www.KYOpera.org
Reviewed by Brian Walker
So, I’m thinking that there are opera people and then there are not-opera people and I’m also thinking that I have officially decided I fall into the camp of folks who just don’t get, don’t like it, and would rather listen to Nicki Minaj on the way home than sit through three hours of folks singing when they should be talking.
I hadn’t seen an opera since high school and maybe I’ll try again in another twenty years or so but until then (after this evening) I’m officially out.
The Merry Widow finds Hanna Glawari, a rich widow, looking for a husband at the Pontevedrian Embassy in Paris. Baron Mirko Zeta is the Pontevedrian Ambassador in Paris who is trying to find Ms. Glawari a mate in an effort to keep her money in the principality. He’s married to Valencienne who is having an affair with Camille de Rosillon, who is courting Hanna Glawari for her money. Enter Count Danilo Danilovitch who is the first secretary to the Baron and has a history with Hanna Glawari and maybe even some unrequited sensations. It’s all very cute and predictable and trite.
Are you bored yet? Yeah; I was too.
There‘s some modern language/current event references added in (I assume) to be relatable to a modern audience but I didn’t get it; they all served to de-rail the illusion of the time period and the suspension of disbelief that the story is supposed to be happening in 1913 and not 2012.
The curtain rose to much excitement with a stage full of performers bustling and moving and I was immediately drawn in. The set was very impressive with French period furniture and a huge staircase that seemed to go on forever and a chorus of enthusiastic and talented performers decked out in gorgeous black and white costumes that frilled and flowed and followed.
And then they all started singing and I struggled to stay engaged.
The chorus was really delightful; I found myself looking forward to them to return to the stage whenever they weren’t around. They all made really nice choices and did what a great chorus does: made up a single entity which created a world that happened around the principals and setting the stage to make the principals believable and interesting.
The principals were all fine opera singers but not a one really stuck out and made me sit up the way the chorus did. When they weren't singing most of the acting was incredibly stylized and very “I just said something funny now I’m going to look at you, the beautiful audience, and you can laugh.” There were also SEVERAL moments when the females who were supposed to be the focal point of the entire stage weren’t in their light. Maybe it was creative shadowing or something artsy like that, but many points in the evening it seemed the Opera ordered a few too few lights. Or maybe they just weren't strong enough. Or maybe there were plentyof lights, the darlings just couldn’t find them; I don’t know. I’m used to working in spaces with maybe seven lights total for the entire stage so what do I know anyway?
Alright. I promised myself I wasn’t going to get political with this review because it’s supposed to be about the art…BUT...I have to admit it was difficult and unsettling walking through the crowd of musicians protesting outside the Brown Friday night because they feel they’re being treated unfairly by the Orchestra (and by extension and even in many ways from the outside observer; by the Opera too) and then sitting down with my very glossy, very expensive looking program full of luxury car ads and pages upon pages of sponsors and advertisers. I’m just saying and that’s all I’m saying.
I don’t want to take away from the passion and hard work that went into making this production happen because the sheer spectacle of it was quite incredible and the audience really seemed to be engaged and enjoyed their evening at the opera; but overall and specifically this production just wasn’t for me.
The Merry Widow
2/17 and 2/19, 2012
at the Brown Theatre
Kentucky Opera
315 West Broadway
Louisville, Kentucky 40202
584-4500
http://www.KYOpera.org
Saturday, February 11, 2012
REVIEW: The Gin Game
“We laugh with pity at the vanity of the human will.” Gustave Flaubert
“It is the human will that is funny.” D. L. Coburn
Reviewed by Mark Sawyer-Dailey
As a critic, one always looks at a production with a critical eye
– occupational hazard. But last night’s
opening night of the Bunbury’s newest offering, D. L. Coburn’s only hit play,
THE GIN GAME, was critic-proof. It was
perfection, masterful in so many ways that it makes my job all the easier. And
the audience raved about it.
“This winner of the 1978 Pulitzer Prize, which starred Jessica Tandy and Hume Cronyn, and was later revived with Julie Harris and Charles Durning, uses a game as a metaphor for life. Weller Martin is playing solitaire on the porch of a seedy nursing home. Enter Fonsia Dorsey, a prim, self righteous lady. They discover they both dislike the home and enjoy gin rummy so they begin to play and to reveal intimate details of their lives.” Warning: Adult language abounds.
“This winner of the 1978 Pulitzer Prize, which starred Jessica Tandy and Hume Cronyn, and was later revived with Julie Harris and Charles Durning, uses a game as a metaphor for life. Weller Martin is playing solitaire on the porch of a seedy nursing home. Enter Fonsia Dorsey, a prim, self righteous lady. They discover they both dislike the home and enjoy gin rummy so they begin to play and to reveal intimate details of their lives.” Warning: Adult language abounds.
THE GIN GAME was Actor’s Theatre of Louisville’s very first Humana
Festival play in 1976 and was revised a few years ago by said theatre. The Bunbury’s production far surpassed
ATL’s: while ATL’s version lacked heart,
last night’s GIN GAME was loaded with heart. ‘I laughed, I cried, it was better
than…ATL’s!’
Two things you can always expect at the Bunbury, a great set and a
terrific sound design. The Bunbury is a
wonderful space, and as always Steve Woodring fills it well with another
superior set…the porch of Bentley’s home for Seniors. If the Gin game is a
metaphor, so is this porch, set away from the rest of the world, a collection
of old and discarded objects which are never used, and as we see erosion in the
characters lives, we soon discover it in their environment. Mr. Woodring is another special gift to
Louisville audiences, and has found a perfect home for his work at the Bunbury.
His lighting was just right: supportive and not intrusive. I only have two minor flaws for the
evening, and one was the lightning effects appeared to be a technical error,
and not planned. The other was audience
members entering late and leaving early: in such an intimate space, ‘tis most
distracting. What happened to “No late
seating”? The sound design was symbolic
(supportive) but not intrusive, as a sound design should be. (Don’t believe me? Just watch and listen
to any Woody Allen film…like “Manhattan” or “Midnight in Paris”)
I am most critical of theatre directors in Louisville, but realize
that this is a national problem: we don’t know how to teach our directors to
direct. So I say to all local directors,
go and see THE GIN GAME as an example of how to direct a play. Juergen K. Tossmann’s directing is flawless:
the play moves at a swift and steady pace, and all the pauses and silences are
earned, not wasted. His shaping of the
play, moment by moment, shows careful planning, and unity, and the arc of the
play was easily seen, without brining attention to it. Blocking is only 20% of the director’s task,
and Mr. Tossmann’s was clear, clean, and supported all of the play’s actions,
intentions. Simple. Less is more.
If local directors can take much away from the play’s direction,
then local actors should get thy-selves to see these two superior performances
by Matt Orme (Weller Martin) and Liz Vissing (Fonsia Dorsey). What can one say about two well-seasoned
actors such as these? I have been a fan
of Mr. Orme’s works for years, but one of the high points of my acting career
was working with him in 1776. He is an actor’s actor, a consummate
professional onstage and off, and a real gentleman; generous and giving, on and
off stage. The man brings so much
integrity and heart to his work, he is inspiring to me, and should be to other
actors. His Weller Martin was right on
the mark. He found the arc of his
character, and crafted his performance around it. He found humor when needed, pathos when
needed, quiet moments when needed. Much
of his dialogue was spoken in anger, not an easy task to maintain for almost two
hours. But he did it, as it wasn’t about
his anger, which for young actors means “more yelling and stamping of feet,” but
more importantly, about what made him angry.
He modulated his performance, and the payoff was terrific. Don’t miss this one, and never miss the
opportunity to work with this genius.
Liz Vissing’s Fonsia Dorsey was just as wonderful: she stood her
ground with Mr. Orme’s powerful curmudgeon.
Another of Louisville’s greats, Ms. Vissing played foil for Weller, and
was equally as strong when Martin played foil to her. What a delightful back and forth, a solid
partnership of give and take on the stage.
It shows what teamwork will do.
(Many local theatre artists forget the adage, “If I want to look good
onstage, I need to make you look good!”)
Her every moment was full and you knew exactly what she wanted and where
it came from, another sign of her greatness as actor whether it’s comedy or
drama. I can’t imagine a more perfect Fonsia.
If you like a play that does it all: entertains you, moves you,
makes you think, is a totally unified work of art, and will inspire you to
support theatre, the Bunbury’s THE GIN GAME is just right for you. Don’t miss it, and tell your friends. But hey, this is just my opinion, don’t take
my word for it, see it for yourself.
Support live local theatre.
PS: This note was given to us at the door last night: smart
marketing! “Please Help Fund THE GIN
GAME https://power2give.org/go/p/504 Your donation will be matched Dollar for
Dollar” - ours was!
THE GIN GAME runs February 10th-26th
Wednesday through Saturday- 7:30 pm
Sundays - 2:00pm
Wednesday through Saturday- 7:30 pm
Sundays - 2:00pm
It replaces previously announced ‘On An Average Day’.
Weller Martin.....Matt Orme
Fonsia Dorsey.....Liz Vissing
THE DIRECTOR
Juergen K. Tossmann
SET AND LIGHTING DESIGN
Steve Woodring
FURNISHINGS AND COSTUMING
Marty Crawley
Bunbury Theatre Company at the Henry Clay
604 S. Third Street
Louisville, Kentucky 40250
502 585-5306
bunburytheatre@gmail.com
http://www.bunburytheatre.org
REVIEW: Once in a Blue Moon
LE
PETOMANE’S ONCE IN A BLUE MOON
A Review by
Carlos Manuel
There is something very
excited about going to see a show that has been created by a group of artists
who most likely sat down around the kitchen table with a couple of beers, and
said to each other, “Okay, what can we do next?” After creating 5 Things, which Le Petomane presented at
The Bard’s Town Theatre, Once in a Blue
Moon seems to be an idea they decided to put together while developing a
much more theatrical and intellectual concept. This is not to say that the show
isn’t entertaining. It is, but smart or intelligent? It is not.
Unmistakable though, Once in a Blue Moon has a clear plot and
is well-structured. It is clear that at least one member of the company, if not
all, understands the importance of the “hero’s journey.” In this case, the main
character is a heroine by the name of Ruby, who, against her will, is thrown
into an adventure, where she has to overcome a few obstacles in order to defeat
her antagonist, and of course live happily ever after.
Ruby is born to royalty
and has been given the gift of singing. The problem is that singing is
prohibited in the kingdom—something that is explained at the beginning of the
play but I honestly forgot within seconds. Because she can’t sing anywhere,
Ruby decides to go to an isolated place where she can do it to her heart’s
content. Unfortunately it is there where three entities from another dimension (Blue
Slickster, Blue Rouge, and Coyote Blue) step into her world and steal her
voice. Because this a fairy tale, there is a narrator, named Fairy
Thoughtfather, who guides the story, breaking the fourth wall (like in any
storytelling play) and communicating with the heroine. He encourages Ruby to
find her voice, travel to the other dimension and take back what was stolen
from her. And of course, she does, bringing the closing of the play to a happy
note.
The show opens with an
original music piece played by the members of the cast. Then a narrator sings a
couple of songs to set the scene and the style of the work. It turns out that Once in a Blue Moon is a play with music
and songs because it is all about the desire to sing or the desire to express oneself
through singing. Ironically, I find the singing to be the weakest element in
the production.
I can easily tell the four
actors are experienced and as an ensemble they are very comfortable with each
other. They’re very talented and know how to play off of each other. It is also
clear they know how to create a journey, use plot point devices, and have their
heroine confront her enemies, triumph over them, learn a lesson and emerge
anew.
I can almost guarantee
that someone in the company has read Joseph Campbell and/or Christopher Vogler—essential
reading material for any writer. Yet, with all the experience and perhaps
knowledgeable literature, Le Petomane’s Once
in a Blue Moon is short of creativity and cohesiveness. All the elements
needed to create a good theatrical experience are present, yet there are times
when I felt I was watching amateur improvisation or an unfinished/unpolished
segment.
There are however,
memorable moments filled with wit, laughter, sexual tension, and good acting.
Heather Burns as Coyote Blue is hypnotizing, and as Mona Moonstone and Flo
she’s hilarious. Tony Dingman brings the sexual tension in Ruby as Blue
Slickster, and as Trucker Joe his hip hop is spot on—too bad the stomping
segment felt more like a child’s tantrum than a cacophony of rhythmic steps. Kyle
Ware’s narration as Fairy Thoughtfather is witty and Kristie Rolape’s Ruby is
comical.
The majority of characters
in this story are underdeveloped. And even though the heroine’s journey is
interesting, the stakes are not high at all. At the end, there aren’t any
memorable moments and no one in the audience truly ends up caring for any of
the characters or story.
Yet, I can’t help myself
but wonder that if the company were to spend a little more time developing more
solid dialogue, turning the characters into three-dimensional entities, and
giving Ruby a more meaningful and tangible existence, Once in a Blue Moon could be an excellent theatrical piece. As it
is right now, it is too short (1 hr 15 min), filled with lots of empty moments,
and although well-plot out, it isn’t solid and polished enough to feel like a “finished
product.”
Or maybe I needed to have
a couple of beers before seeing the show because there were a lot of people who
were laughing out loud at the opening night show. Then again, these were the
same people who, as soon as the lights when out on the stage and the first
musical sounds were heard, were already giggling because they knew the actors
and these people knew the actors were going to be funny no matter what they did
or said.
Once in a Blue Moon
at the Rudyard Kipling (Oak Street)
Fri., February 10 at 7:30 p.m.
Sat., February 11 at 7:30 p.m.
Mon., February 13 at 7:30 p.m.
Thu., February 16 at 7:30 p.m.
Fri., February 17 at 7:30 p.m.
Sat., February 18 at 7:30 p.m.
Tickets
$8 -- 20 sliding scale
Contact us@LePetomane.org or 502-609-2520 for show reservations or more information, or find them on Facebook.
For pre-show dinner reservations, please contact the Rudyard Kipling directly at (502) 636-1311.
Sat., February 11 at 7:30 p.m.
Mon., February 13 at 7:30 p.m.
Thu., February 16 at 7:30 p.m.
Fri., February 17 at 7:30 p.m.
Sat., February 18 at 7:30 p.m.
Tickets
$8 -- 20 sliding scale
Contact us@LePetomane.org or 502-609-2520 for show reservations or more information, or find them on Facebook.
For pre-show dinner reservations, please contact the Rudyard Kipling directly at (502) 636-1311.
Thursday, February 9, 2012
REVIEW: In the Next Room or The Vibrator Play
A Review by
Carlos Manuel
Presenting the subject of
female orgasms and the discovery of the vibrator per se is not a subject one
can easily approach, especially on the stage. Yet, Sarah Ruhl uses her unique
voice to write about both matters in an intellectual, comfortable, and
entertaining manner.
Set at the turn of the 19th
C., Sarah Ruhl’s comedy introduces the audience to the professional life of Dr.
Givings and his fascination with the use of electricity to treat women (and men)
with vibratory massages to improve the symptoms of hysteria. The play is also
about his romantic life (or lack thereof) with his eager-for-life and thirsty-for-love
wife.
Dr. Givings’ medical
approaches are so successful that every patient who comes to see him shows
significant signs of recuperation yet, when the doctor decides treatments are
no longer needed, the patients find themselves begging to come back because
they are sure that without such vibratory massages, their symptoms are bound to
come back.
And while Dr. Givings’
professional life flourishes, his personal life diminishes, mainly because he’s
unable to emotionally connect with his wife, who slowly but surely discovers
that what women experience during the time they are treated by her husband, are
nothing but erotic and sexual reactions to the electrical stimulations.
By the end of act one,
Mrs. Givings’ emptiness has inundated not only her inner self but also her
entire house. But thanks to the close
relationship that by now she has developed with Sabrina Daldry (one of the
patients), she is able to overcome her loneliness and soon find the courage to
pull her husband from his unemotional and scientific approach to their love
life.
By the end, both husband
and wife, who have been physically and emotionally apart from each other, end
up braking the taboos of the times by daring to look at each other’s bodies
under the light and by finally having the opportunity to express their love,
not only with words but physically too. It is through these incredible journeys
that the characters find their existence and their meaning in life, which only
support Sarah Ruhl’s smart and energetic writing.
Actors Theatre of
Louisville’s production however, is not as electrifying at it should be. The
actors are professionals in their parts. The set design and lighting are
incredibly accurate and effective. The costumes and wigs are beautiful and
something to admire. Yet, the entire production seems to be under a sedative
and very much in the need for an electrical jolt. (Yes, the pun is intended.)
I was not expecting to see
a production with humorous physical gags and cheap sexual innuendos. Sara Ruhl
is much more than that. In fact, her take on this matter is found in the
program’s notes. I was expecting, though, a production I could heartily enjoy and
be entertained by from beginning to end.
Sara Ruhl’s script is crisp,
funny, emotional, moving, and intelligent, and every actor in it is incredibly
good. All of them play their part with precision and professionalism, yet, I
blame the director (Laura Gordon) for inducing in the cast a sleeping spell
that almost took over several members of the audience who started to yawn
towards the end of act-one and in the middle of act two.
If it hadn’t been for the
ingenious moments where the characters are intrigued about the use of the
Doctor’s new contraption which cures women’s hysteria or about the appearance
of an eccentric male artist who also suffers from hysteria, the production
would have fallen flat from the start.
Both Tyla Abercrumbie as
Mrs. Givings and Matthew Brumlow as the French painter Leo Irving bring to the
stage the much needed energy in this production. When matters turns to the
emotional and moving, Jenny McKinght as the “wet nurse’ and in the very last
scene Mr. Grant Goodman as Dr. Givings know how to touch our hearts.
Overall, In the Next Room or the Vibrator Play is
fun and entertaining, as well as intelligent and moving. And although ATL’s
production isn’t incredibly electrifying, it is still a production which must
not be missed.
In the Next Room or The Vibrator Play
by Sarah Ruhl
Co-production with Milwaukee Repertory Theater
Actors Theatre of Louisville
316 W Main Street
Louisville, Kentucky 40202
502-584-1205
info@actorstheatre.org
http://www.actorstheatre.org
Actors Theatre of Louisville
316 W Main Street
Louisville, Kentucky 40202
502-584-1205
info@actorstheatre.org
http://www.actorstheatre.org
Runs through February 18, 2012
So Many Plays!
Just take a look at the side bar for all the openings in February! Louisville theatre is booming! If you can't find something you like, you are a real curmudgeon!! There are so many shows running now, we at Theatre Louisville can't possibly review them all. But that doesn't mean you should not go to see them!
And don't forget about college and high school theatre productions. You might be surprised by what you see, and for a bargain to boot. Broadway's stars of tomorrow can be seen for a mere pittance!
If you'd like to join the ranks of our esteemed reviewers, drop an email to: theat.louisville@gmail.com
We can't pay you, but you get free tickets~and the fame and glory of being a theatre critic!
And don't forget about college and high school theatre productions. You might be surprised by what you see, and for a bargain to boot. Broadway's stars of tomorrow can be seen for a mere pittance!
If you'd like to join the ranks of our esteemed reviewers, drop an email to: theat.louisville@gmail.com
We can't pay you, but you get free tickets~and the fame and glory of being a theatre critic!
Thursday, February 2, 2012
REVIEW: dirty sexy derby play
Reviewed by Mark
Sawyer-Dailey
Brian Walker both wrote and directed dirty sexy derby play and it is just that: very dirty, very
sexy. Warning: this play is not for the faint
of heart – it is THE BOYS IN THE BAND meets WHO’S AFRAID OF VIRGINIA WOOLF and
might make David Mamet blush. But it might also be titled dirty sexy derby key-party post tornado of 1974 play. Play: four couples meet on Derby Day 1974 (still in
the midst of the sexual revolution, pre-AIDS) to indulge in a key (partner
swapping) party. All of the characters
have secrets, and want to communicate something. Mr. Walker’s writing is tight, the dialogue
moves right along, and is often very funny: references to “Louisville” made the
evening more enjoyable, “You can get anything on Bardstown Road.” Friday’s
audience greatly enjoyed it. If you
don’t like this opening paragraph, screw you, but read on.
When writing I try not to add a disclaimer or apologize, but
I feel that I must. We had the
misfortune of sitting behind three middle aged women, drinking, and talking,
checking electronic devices through the entire play, marring a good 10% of the
plays dialogue. And this play’s director
is wise enough to understand ‘pace’, and moves the dialogue along at a terrific
rate; so much was missed thanks to this rude, obnoxious, selfish trio. I ‘shushed’ them four times, and I noticed
two other audience members did the same (thanks
for that support; more theatre people in the room should have; more audience
members should do some ‘Shhhhhh-ing’) and they wouldn’t button it. How sad that three people, amidst a full
audience, feel that they have the right to ruin a play for those of us who
understand theatre etiquette and stay quiet until intermission. Perhaps a preshow speech might have assisted
them in getting the hint? The character
of Vanessa, the hostess of the party and the first of many characters to speak
directly to us, could have mentioned it?
I believe that the play’s consistent style would have allowed this. But it appeared to be a ‘girl’s night out’
and nothing was going to stop them from having fun…to the detriment of perhaps
50 other audience members?
While I am on this rant, I take exception to Shaun Kenney’s
bio ,”He is and always will be the best damn stage manager this company has
seen.” No, perhaps the second best,
because Mr. Kenney was sitting in the back, above the audience, near the three
weird sisters. He must have heard their rudeness – he certainly heard three of
us shushing them. But he chose to do
nothing. Where was the house manager, or
wait-staff? Producers need to know and
react accordingly, that how an audience feels about rudeness ultimately affects
their feelings about the play…it did ours.
In a year’s time it will mar my memory of the play.
The metaphors of the play (Derby, key party, and post
tornado) were clear and helped to communicate the play’s deeper meanings: an odd group of people converge at the party,
each carrying a secret, each wanting to find a way out of the lies of their
lives. It is dirty…the prurient in me
says “filthy” as the C word, women as bitches; blow jobs; simulated sex acts; same
sex kissing…are all bantered about frequently.
It came close to being gratuitous, but seemed justified at end of
play. The older, more conservative
theatre practitioner in me questions this use of vulgarity which at times,
seemed like pushing the envelope too hard.
Can’t we make the same point in plays without it? As I think back on this production, I can’t
really see it done without the language, so perhaps it is necessary. It certainly says something about the people
and their times. But I realize that I am an older theatre-goer. It seemed that all of the sexual jargon and
references stopped short of nudity. (Sex
acts were simulated) Why not ‘go all the
way”? Have some creative fun with the
onstage cunnilingus, or sex acts. Don’t just
wade in, dive in!
Dialogue was earthy and sexy; perhaps the actions should have
been also. If you want to get a 10 on my
peter meter, just do it. Take your
panties off and toss them aside before the acts. When one loses a rather cruel game (right
from THE BOYS IN THE BAND) and has to expose himself….his chest!?!? This is a sex party for goodness sakes. Drop trou, facing upstage. Or we could deal with seeing Francine’s
breasts when she flashes her neighbors.
I am not a fan of this style of theatre that Mr. Walker
writes very well – loud, angry, and bitter.
A play has to have a main character, one whom we like and can identify
with on their journey, their arc. Then
again, I am old fashioned. But I personally did not like any of these
characters. We like the characters in
VIRGINIA WOOLF, we like the characters in Mort Crowley’s play THE BOYS IN THE
BAND (two of my favorite plays). We root
for them.
I do question any playwright who directs their own work:
it’s difficult; you have no objective eye from which to approach the work. Mr. Walker loses track of the actual spine of
the play, which was a bit confusing. He
did well in blocking eight people on a small set for the vast majority of the
evening. Since the space is not raked,
when actors were sitting downstage, their action and dialogue was lost to those
in the rear. The character of Francine
spent much of the play sitting down, down stage left…a wise choice if you have
an actor that can fill and sustain this length of time. And Mr. Walker’s Francine is just such an
actor who sustained it. Which leads me
to the performances.
The performances were very solid and the actors were in
total command of the words, their objectives; and their choices were, for the
most part, terrific. The key party’s
hosts, Vanessa and Carl, were played convincingly by Briana Clemerson and Corey
Long, and as hosts, carried the bulk of the dialogue. Well handled by both actors. I have been a
long time fan of Ms. Clemerson’s work and it’s great seeing her back onstage. I
want to see more of her acting. There is a great deal of screaming in this
play, and it gets tiring after awhile.
Do you like being yelled at? I
wish she had been able to find some variety, some modulation and not always go
for the obvious choice – screaming. I
believe that Vanessa was the main character: perhaps by softening all of her
yelling, she may have earned more sympathy, and thus, become the main
character. The director should have assisted her with this, which is not an
easy task. Some of her lines were lost
in her screams.
The first of the party guests were Lana (Elizabeth Cox) and
Tim (Todd Zeigler), two nebbishes who are currently living in a motel while
their tornado-ravaged home is under repair; well done. Next couple to arrive was Francine and
Victor, (Leah Roberts and Andy Epstein).
Now, I am a huge fan of Leah Roberts and have never been disappointed in
her work, and am always thrilled to see her continue to work, and improve…like
a fine wine. (I am eager to see her play
Martha in WHO’S AFRAID OF VIRGINIA WOOLF in 15 years!!) Her Francine was no exception – terrific
work, as always. Victor had, perhaps,
the biggest secret of the guests; his work was good, and he was very convincing.
And then comes Theresa and Dennis, played extremely well by
the amazing Sarah “you will get crabs!” East and Eric Welch. Good ole Louisville rednecks, they were
comic relief and as well as different social level among the guests. Their accents were spot on, perhaps too good,
as they spoke so fast this viewer often lost some of the words. But Ms. East received a well deserved
applause on her final exit, as her work was one of the most solid and
consistent among the ensemble. Mr. Walker’s
words were a great part of this ovation, by the way = great team work. Mr. Welch’s Dennis was also very fine, and
his character did grow on me, like a fungus.
The ensemble was so obviously having fun, enjoying each other, that one
almost forgets the vulgarities so freely used.
The costumes reminded me of my youth, and lights were
terrific, as was the set. For a small
space, they consistently do very fine work and make it happen with
integrity. Let’s support the Bard’s
Town, and encourage them.
While I have your ear, I would like to rave about the Bard’s
Town Theatre and pub, 1801 Bardstown Road, @Speed Avenue. This new establishment must be commended and
encouraged. We dined preshow and the
food was terrific. The menu is very clever: appetizers = “Prologues”; main courses = Act I
and Act I, ii; desserts = “Epilogues”. You can choose from a Corn-delia; The
Julius Caesar Salad; To Bean or Not to Bean; Two Noble Crab Cakes; The Mushroom
of Venice and last but not least, Cymbeline-guini. The upstairs theatre has been reworked into
a very fine performance space, and with the already mentioned lack of raked
space, works extremely well. I strongly
hope we all support the Bard’s Town, for many reasons. We must.
It is too important of an opportunity for Louisville’s audience and
theatre artists not to take advantage of.
Check it out: www.thebardstown.com.
In short, if you can deal with all the language and
simulated sex scenes, and person to person cruelty, you should see this play
(again, not for the faint of heart) you will see some fine ensemble work, and a
solid technical play. But hey, don’t
take my word for it, it’s just one person’s opinion; go see it and decide for
yourself. Ends Feb. 4.
dirty sexy derby play
Written and directed by Brian Walker
The Bard’s Town Theatre
1801 Bardstown Road
Louisville, KY 40205
January 26, 27, 28, February 2, 3 & 4
7:30pm
$15 General Admission, cash only please
Call 502.876.0532 to reserve tickets.
Cast:
Briana Clemerson as Vanessa
Corey Long as Carl
Elizabeth Cox
Sarah East
Leah Roberts
Andy Epstein
Eric Welch
Todd Zeigler
and Michael Roberts
January 26, 27, 28, February 2, 3 & 4
7:30pm
$15 General Admission, cash only please
Call 502.876.0532 to reserve tickets.
Cast:
Briana Clemerson as Vanessa
Corey Long as Carl
Elizabeth Cox
Sarah East
Leah Roberts
Andy Epstein
Eric Welch
Todd Zeigler
and Michael Roberts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

